Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Vetoes, insufficient votes and competing draft resolutions accentuate divisions within the Council
2 April 2022
Since 2000, and especially since 2010, there has been a marked increase in divisive votes in the Security Council,
which reflects the fact that some Council members are now less willing to shield the Council's divisions from
public view. In part, this reflects the polarizing nature of some key items more recently before the Council . . .
Last Update: 24 Apr. 2024
UPDATE WEBSITE OF
THE PROCEDURE OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL, 4TH EDITION
by Loraine Sievers and Sam Daws, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014
Updated on 6 September 2015
Chapter 7: DECISIONS AND DOCUMENTS
Section 7: Letters by the Council President
Changes to peacekeeping deployments effected through exchanges of letters
In the book (page 428) it is stated that letters by the President have authorized changes in deployment or other measures affecting UN peacekeeping missions. A recent example is that of two exchanges of letters between the Secretary-General and the Council President, dated 26 and 30 June 2015, and 20 and 24 August 2015, respectively. Through these letters, it was agreed that a unit of Cambodian deminers serving in the UN Interim Force in Lebanon would be deployed to the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus, under the framework of inter-mission cooperation, to clear a hazardous area within the buffer zone. The initial redeployment, as agreed in the first exchange of letters, was to last until early August 2015 (S/2015/494 and S/2015/495). Owing to the complexity of the mine clearing operation, an extension until December 2015 was agreed in the second exchange of letters (S/2015/660 and S/2015/661).