Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Vetoes, insufficient votes and competing draft resolutions accentuate divisions within the Council
2 April 2022
Since 2000, and especially since 2010, there has been a marked increase in divisive votes in the Security Council,
which reflects the fact that some Council members are now less willing to shield the Council's divisions from
public view. In part, this reflects the polarizing nature of some key items more recently before the Council . . .
Last Update: 18 Apr. 2024
UPDATE WEBSITE OF
THE PROCEDURE OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL, 4TH EDITION
by Loraine Sievers and Sam Daws, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014
CHAPTER 9: Section 1(g) Changes
Monthly presidency assessments are crucial to preparation of Council's Annual Report (with table)
Most recent update: 4 February 2023
Written monthly assessments by each rotating Security Council presidency were first instituted in 1997, and for many years they were regularly submitted by virtually all Council members. But beginning in 2015, some Council members began to insist that assessments be adopted by consensus, contrary to the original guidelines, and this has led to a marked decrease in published assessments . . .
Momentum builds to restore status of presidency assessments as national outcomes, not Council consensus documents
Russia and United States, reversing their earlier participation, have not submitted since 2015
3 February 2024
Many Council members are now recommitting to publishing monthly presidency assessments. It is hoped that
this momentum will increase, and will also result in greater timeliness, and that Russia and the United States will
resume their participation, making the publication of assessments once again universal . . .
Monthly presidency assessments are crucial to preparation of Council’s Annual Report (with table)
Originally posted 20 Aug. 2019; most recent update 1 Oct. 2020
When the Security Council adopted its 2018 Annual Report on 20 August 2019, this was the third year in a row that the report was overdue by about five months . . .
In 2019, the Council adopts a presidential note intended to promote more timely submission of its Annual Report to the General Assembly
30 January 2020
On 27 December 2019, after extended negotiation in the Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Questions, the Security Council adopted a presidential note representing a new effort by Council members to deal with the chronic lateness of their Annual Report to the General Assembly . . .